This is a really interesting question, and it's something we've seen many collecting organizations think through as their digital assets continue to grow beyond the permanent collection.
While our clients use Artwork Archive rather than Argus, one approach we've seen work well is using the collections management system as a searchable hub for digital assets and rights documentation. Organizations attach digital assets not only to object records, but also to contacts (artists, donors, photographers, lenders), exhibitions, locations, maintenance records, and other related records so everything stays connected.
For assets that aren't tied to a specific accessioned object, our organization clients use a dedicated document repository within their collections management platform. In Artwork Archive, clients use My Docs to store and organize digital assets that don't naturally belong on an object, contact, exhibition, or other record, while assets that do relate to those records can be attached directly to them. This provides a searchable home for all digital assets while preserving the relationships between files, people, and projects.
One lesson we've heard repeatedly is that establishing consistent metadata, naming conventions, and documentation practices upfront is just as important as deciding where the files live. The more consistently information about ownership, permissions, usage, and related projects is recorded, the easier digital assets are to find, manage, and reuse over time.
I'd be interested to hear how other Argus users have approached this as well.
Best of luck!
Elysian
Head of Partnerships
Artwork Archive