I don't know how robust your museum's evaluation programs are, but echoing those who referred to possible solutions that do not involve the criminal justice system, it could be a truly radical act to get a qualitative sense of why the specific people in your lobby chose your lobby. While the answers may seem simple enough--shelter, climate control, a place to be that is clean, has water and a restroom, that has not yet been hostile to these uses/needs--hearing individual stories might actually help to understand the path that leads these particular people to your door. Perhaps the human needs and stories that are elicited could even serve as a basis for an exhibition or cultural collaboration with orgs that work to serve that community.
While I understand the complexity of balancing the need for your museum to be able to serve the public in the ways intended by its mission and not be asked to take on a public role for which it is not purpose-built, there could be real value and benefit to looking at houselessness, excessive heat, poverty, low wages or any of the things presumably driving people to seek shelter in your lobby as the kind of human experiences that would be within your mission to address with art and culture, with ways of seeing that might be able to shift politics or sentiment around vulnerable people in your community.
------------------------------
Kelly Porter
Head of Archives, Preservation Hall
------------------------------