I am wondering how people view digital copies of physical collections in terms of preservation. Traditionally, manuscript and artifact collections that relate to an institution's mission are things that collecting institutions spend resources to preserve according to accepted professional standards. However, if a manuscript collection is scanned, do those scans constitute a collection that should be managed by those same standards of long-term preservation? Or are the scans considered copies and therefore possibly not preserved in perpetuity with the same vigor? A parallel example could be artifacts that are digitally photographed. Do those photographs hold the same preservation priority as the artifact itself?
The assumption within this question is that the physical collection would be maintained with professional care.
Thanks in advance for thoughts and insights.
------------------------------
Ellen Endslow
Director of Collections/Curator
Chester County History Center
West Chester PA
Chester County History Center
------------------------------