With so many terms becoming weaponized in our current political climate (e.g., ESG investing, Social Emotional Learning, Climate Resilience) I am looking for examples of museums that have continued the work, but evaded the controversy, by changing how they talk about what they do.
This could take the form of avoiding trigger words, or talking about their work in ways tailored to key stakeholders who may object to some specific terminology.
For example, as suggested in this article, "using simple language and describing the specific skills" that make up SEL rather than using the term itself, or talking to conservatives about climate action in "hierarchical, individualistic language," an approach recommended by Bob Inglis, former Republican congressman from South Carolina.
As always, discussion welcome in this thread, or privately via Museum Junction messaging, or by emailing me at emerritt (at) aam-us.org
------------------------------
Elizabeth Merritt
VP Strategic Foresight & Founding Director, CFM
American Alliance of Museums
Arlington VA
------------------------------