Open Forum

 View Only
  • 1.  Gifts of Art

    Posted 04-09-2019 09:00 AM
    Hello,

    I'm hoping that colleagues at arts organizations could help me with a couple of questions regarding gifts of art. 

    1. Do you count gifts of art in your annual giving totals. If so, how do you value the gifts of art?

    2. Do you count gifts of art in your lifetime/cumulative giving totals. If so, how do you value the gifts of art?

    Any policies or procedures that you can share regarding how gifts of art are recorded, acknowledged and recognized would also be very much appreciated.

    Thanks!

    Maya

    Maya Erhardt
    Senior Manager of Donor Relations
    Virginia Museum of Fine Arts
    200 N Arthur Ashe Boulevard 
    Richmond, Virginia 23220
    p: 804.204.2666
    AAM Annual Meeting & MuseumExpo, Baltimore, May 16-19, 2024, click to learn more


  • 2.  RE: Gifts of Art

    Posted 04-10-2019 06:57 AM
    Maya:  Yes, and yes, both for annual giving and lifetime giving.  We book the gift at the appraised value of the artwork (gift-in-kind) at the time of the gift.  Ideally, this appraisal is done by an outside appraiser.  However, when that is not possible (or the donor does not need an appraisal for tax purposes), we will use a conservative "curatorial estimate" for the value (duly noted as such in the records). Of course, we make it very clear to the donor that we cannot provide them with appraisals, as that is their responsibility.  When we need to make a curatorial estimate, it is for internal records only.

    ------------------------------
    Gregory Wittkopp
    Director
    Cranbrook Center for Collections and Research
    Bloomfield Hills MI
    ------------------------------

    AAM Annual Meeting & MuseumExpo, Baltimore, May 16-19, 2024, click to learn more


  • 3.  RE: Gifts of Art

    Posted 04-10-2019 06:58 AM
    Dear Maya - In my opinion, any monetary value of gifts of art (and other objects) must be established by a licensed appraiser.  It's inappropriate for museum staff to render opinions of material value.  In fact, the IRS expressly forbids it.  The IRS will also require a licensed appraisal of objects valued at $5,000 or greater if there is to be a tax deduction claimed.  In fact, recently, one of our object donors was informed by her accountant that because she donated a COMBINED value of $5,000 or more in SIMILAR objects to DIFFERENT museums, she still needed the licensed appraisal!

    If the donor wants to know the monetary value for tax purposes, s/he must hire his or her own appraiser.  It's wise for the museum to have a list (without endorsement) of licensed appraisers in your area/state.  Where it can get dicey is when the object(s) value is close to $5,000 and the museum would like to advise the donor whether an appraisal will be necessary.  In such cases, it's great to have a subscription to askart.com.

    Vivian F. Zoë, Director
    Slater Memorial Museum
    108 Crescent Street, Norwich CT 06360
    860-425-5560 vox
    860-885-0379 fax

    "Inspiration is for amateurs - the rest of us just show up and get to work," Chuck Close, 2003


    Please note:  The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments hereto is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipients.  If the reader/recipient of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this e-mail and all attachments hereto in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail or any of its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and destroy the original message received.  Thank You.



    AAM Annual Meeting & MuseumExpo, Baltimore, May 16-19, 2024, click to learn more


  • 4.  RE: Gifts of Art

    Posted 04-10-2019 12:51 PM
    It will be interesting to read responses to this question Maya.  Since museums rigorously avoid giving appraisals for collection gifts how would listing the monetary value of a donation differ from this?  Perhaps if it is cumulative and not itemized it might work.  Since museum collections are worthless...oops, I mean priceless, assigning a price tag to things runs counter to all that museums stand for.  Of course collections are insured but usually for a blanket amount on the assumption that not all will be lost at once.  Unless a museum has a very small collection and can keep tabs on the ebb and flow of the marketplace for such items, it is virtually impossible to set an honest appraisal and keep it current.  Of course, with the fast-growing commercial deaccessioning now favored by derelict boards of trustees, and the rise of television "game" shows such as the Antiques Roadshow, American Pickers, and Pawn Stars, everything has its price, including museum collections.  [For the Roadshow reference see the television sitcom series Frazier, episode 7, season 7 - hysterical.] And, speaking about deaccessioning, though you are asking about listing the market value of art donations, I would be interested to hear from museums that itemize in their annual reports the income gotten from selling individual collections in a given year.  The list could be referenced to the institution's website and should include photos and catalog information.

    Regards,

    Steve   

    Steven Miller
    Doylestown, PA

    ------------------------------
    Steven Miller
    Doylestown, PA

    Executive Director Retired
    Boscobel Restoration, Inc.
    ------------------------------

    AAM Annual Meeting & MuseumExpo, Baltimore, May 16-19, 2024, click to learn more


  • 5.  RE: Gifts of Art

    Posted 04-10-2019 01:22 PM
    Dear Steve - Maya seemed to be asking only about current donations... not objects already in collections.  I may be wrong.  To your comments - Museums absolutely should NOT appraise for others and should not appraise (or even have appraised) their own collections for the very reason to which you allude but don't state - the temptation for some (see debates about Brandeis, Philadelphia Hospital - Dr. Gross Clinic, etc., etc.) institutions is too great and when they are short of cash - monetizing objects becomes too tempting.

    I would also studiously avoid listing publicly de-accessioned objects and what they brought for SOOO many reasons, including, but nor limited to:
    Funds from these can be used only to acquire other objects or for direct care of collections; there may be family members still living who would be offended (even litigious) learning of sales of objects; and again, the temptation by board members (even staff) to view collections as liquid assets is boosted by such a list.

    I insist that auction houses, when representing objects from museum collections list provenance only as "sold to benefit a Connecticut museum."

    Vivian F. Zoë, Director
    Slater Memorial Museum
    108 Crescent Street, Norwich CT 06360
    860-425-5560 vox
    860-885-0379 fax

    "Inspiration is for amateurs - the rest of us just show up and get to work," Chuck Close, 2003


    Please note:  The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments hereto is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipients.  If the reader/recipient of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this e-mail and all attachments hereto in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail or any of its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and destroy the original message received.  Thank You.



    AAM Annual Meeting & MuseumExpo, Baltimore, May 16-19, 2024, click to learn more


  • 6.  RE: Gifts of Art

    Posted 04-10-2019 02:28 PM
    Correct, she was asking about current donations but it touches on a much larger subject.  I was on the board of a museum in New England that capitalizes its collection based on the value upon receipt of an object, whether gotten by purchase or gift.  Because this was the practice from the start of the organization it has continued though inventory price updates are not done.  The value is thus largely historical.  There is nothing wrong with capitalizing collections in this manner.  Some may recall it was a huge issue a couple of decades ago when FASB wanted all museums to value their collections in something of a current and therefore accurate manner.  The opposition was huge.  I was based on two arguments: The idea of putting a price tag on every museum collection item was philosophically repugnant; It would be totally impractical (think especially of natural history museums).  I completely agree with your input and do look forward to additional comments and perspectives.

    Steve



    AAM Annual Meeting & MuseumExpo, Baltimore, May 16-19, 2024, click to learn more