Hi Stephanie,
When I worked for a museum with an encyclopaedic collection, it was policy to identify process in labels corresponding to photographic works, regardless of period--from Daguerreotype, Gelatin-silver print, Albumen print, and so on, to C-print/Chromogenic print, Giclée print, Cibachrome, etc. If there is a concern that, given the context, your visitors will not understand the medium, you could include "photograph" in the label in an elegant way. I do think that museums and collections, as educational resources, have a responsibility to disclose that information to their public. And process is, in many ways, still relevant to the discussion of photography.
Best wishes!
------------------------------
Jennifer Navva Milliken
Curator of Craft
Bellevue Arts Museum
Bellevue WA
Original Message:
Sent: 02-17-2016 02:03 PM
From: Stephanie James
Subject: Photography Medium on Labels
Hi Everyone,
As more artists utilize digital processes as opposed to traditional film processes to create their photographic works, I'm curious how other fine art collections identify the medium of photography on their interpretive labels. Do you even use the term photography or do you reference the process (inkjet prints, archival prints, giclée, gelatin silver print, Type-C color print, etc.)? I'm seeing more references to the techniques, but I question whether the general public will know what the terms mean and consequently, do they know what they're looking at.
Stephanie
Stephanie James
Curator and Collection Educator
Mott-Warsh Collection
111 E. Court St., Ste. 2C
Flint, MI 48502
Ph: (810)767-3989
Fx: (810) 7671207
Stephanie@mfo.com