This is a really interesting and important discussion (and unfortunately, I'm a bit too junior to have been in the middle of it in my career just yet).
But I'm going through a potentially similar experience with my church- we are a historical congregation with a historic church space, historic rectory, and not much space to have events, do community outreach, house our food/clothing/housewares pantry, house events and services for the deaf community who make up a large portion of our parish, and do non-worship activities, etc. So the church has launched a new master plan for a brand new building on a rather iconic piece of land.
What's fascinating about this whole experience is that it is being done with rather radical transparency in to costs, plans, selection processes, etc. through publication, public announcement, and public meetings.
So those of you who have done new master plans, what were your plans for transparency? Were there any? How much did you share with staff who weren't directly involved? The public? I'm wondering how this varies between say, a state/municipal/publicly run museum versus a privately run museum (or hey, even a for profit museum)?
Good topic!
Cheers,
Tracey
-------------------------------------------
Tracey Berg-Fulton
Collections Database Associate
Carnegie Museum of Art
Pittsburgh PA
-------------------------------------------