Sorry for this delayed response Despi. I just returned from 10 days seeing museums, galleries, and exhibitions in Rome and Milan...a terrible burden but someone has to to it....and the experience is better in person than on-line.
I have nothing against museum staff learning on-line but assuming a great increase in viable knowledge because of time spent in front of a computer screen does not always translate well in our field. There's a lot of inconsequential talk out there in museum-internet land. (A reason things like the AAM and regional museum organization meetings and workshops can be so valuable.) As this site proves, museums are very practical places but they are based on theory. Discussions of why they exist can be endless and no one has a singular answer. In fact, if museums ceased to exist tomorow would it matter? After all, musems as we know them are fairly recent inventions. Listing participation in a bunch of on-line courses, or symposia, or chats, or programs on a resume tells me little about a person's real on-the-job abiities, inclinations and devotion. I won't mention fears about proving actual participation and what was learned. More than a few of us are devoted to computer screens at the expense of what we should be doing with collections, exhibitions, education, security, facilities, visitor services, and so many other aspects of our field that demand direct involvements with objects, people and places. I will use myself as an example.
A few years ago I completed about an hour-long "test" regarding sexual harassment and racial and ethnic sensitivieis to contiue teaching at a school where I was on the faculy. I passed with flying colors and printed out the "certificate" for my personal files, and my HR file at the museum where I worked at the time. Obviously the school received the results independently of me. There is no way to know that someone other than I took that test yet I can list in in a resume. I recognize that people taking classes with real people in real places might not do well but few can have someone sit in for them. Also, as someone who has taught museum studies for many years, there is nothing like the personal interaction between students (plural) and faculty. Finally, and this reflects generational changes in our field, when I was a young professional I could not get enough of courses in things that would help me learn more about curatorial aspects of our field. Being in New York City enhanced those opportunities. Today, of course, long distance learning is a boon, especially for people in the boonies, but as the old song says "The ain't nothin' like the real thing baby."
Thanks!
Steve
------------------------------
Steven Miller
Executive Director
Boscobel House and Gardens
Garrison NY
Original Message:
Sent: 09-23-2016 08:25 AM
From: Despi Ross
Subject: Online museum training / CPD courses
Hello Steve,
I'm wondering why you feel that way. In my experience, many museums can't afford to send staff on professional development trips (and they definitely don't pay most people sufficiently to fund personal travel for work), so distance learning with video seems to be a way for staff to have access to some innovative thinking. Otherwise they are limited to the existing ideas and experience within their institution or those in the immediate vicinity. And while that can be valuable, too, if someone is offering expertise that could lead the industry, why we would discount it because it is shared online?
-Despi
Despi Ross
Founder & Lead Strategist
The Museum Playbook
317.260.7850