Open Forum

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

Is Your Museum Collection 100% Catalogued?

  • 1.  Is Your Museum Collection 100% Catalogued?

    Posted 11-17-2015 08:31 PM

    Good Afternoon,

    The Valdez Museum & Historical Archive is a small museum with a very passionate and dedicated staff that work tirelessly to preform the mission of our institution.  I am fortunate to have a full time Curator of Collections & Exhibitions and a full time Curator of Education & Public Programs.  We have an annual operating budget of roughly $750,000 with a collection of roughly 75,000 + items. These items range from documents in the archives to large artifacts such as a 1907 Ahrens Steamer Fire Truck and everything in between. Our collection is not stagnant.  We continue to collect.  As a small museum my staff and I wear multiple hats and work collaboratively as a team but are not able to spend every hour on cataloguing the collection.  

    Today, I was informed by a Board Member that the Museum's collection should be 100% catalogued.  At present, our collection is 75% fully catalogued and over 90% with bare bones documentation.

    I am curious, is your collection 100% catalogued?  

    ------------------------------
    Patricia Relay
    Executive Director
    Valdez Museum & Historical Archive
    Valdez AK
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Is Your Museum Collection 100% Catalogued?

    Posted 11-17-2015 10:12 PM

    A collection that size with that kind of record?  You're doing pretty good.  I interviewed last week and was told the collections position I was seeking had to manage a 10 year backlog, which was apparently not as bad as the 40 year backlog of the director's colleague.  The small museums I've worked for have had significantly less processed - with collections or archives better cataloged over the other.  Obviously in a perfect world, yes every piece would be properly cataloged, but that isn't always the case for smaller museums or those with poor funding.   Larger museums have better resources and funding to make this happen, though, and those members who work for such organizations could easily provide guidance in getting that last 25% processed.  If you're looking to speed up the cataloging process, consider training volunteers to help with paperwork, storage, and electronic database entering.  This is also good for interns as well.

    ------------------------------
    Rhiannon Cizon
    Graduate Student
    MALS - Heritage Management
    Valparaiso University



  • 3.  RE: Is Your Museum Collection 100% Catalogued?

    Posted 11-18-2015 07:48 AM
    Could you define what you mean by catalogued? Many steps from registration, then barebones, finally barebones identification. We receive so much so fast we always have barebones level catalogued within 30 days of receipt but takes longer to fully catalog every item and always have some backlog--that's with 6 people involved at some level of cataloging for 100,000 3-d items
    And 150,000 photographs.

    75% sounds fine but your definition of steps of the process should be identified.



    Sent from my iPhone




  • 4.  RE: Is Your Museum Collection 100% Catalogued?

    Posted 11-18-2015 09:21 AM

    I can't speak for my organization because I am not directly involved in cataloging- but in my former freelancing days, if I had a museum of your size tell me there was a 75% catalog rate, I'd be over the moon. The above poster makes an astute observation, though. You need to define your idea of "Cataloging". If it's basic information done at intake, great. If we're talking full on researching and etc., then yeah, things are different. But I'd also say that cataloging is rarely, rarely, 100% of someone's time, for good reason. The attention to detail needed to do it accurately 100% of the time isn't sustainable for an 8 hr day, in my opinion. In most places I've been or worked, cataloging has some designated hours during the week to allow staff to work on other things and to have a break and share the burden.

    I said this in my ARCS talk last week- in a collection of x number of objects, you can probably triple that number to get the amount of data and metadata around each object. It's maybe a tad unrealistic to expect all of this information to be perfect, and to be done, 100%, at all times.

    ------------------------------
    Tracey Berg-Fulton
    Collections Database Associate
    Carnegie Museum of Art
    Pittsburgh PA



  • 5.  RE: Is Your Museum Collection 100% Catalogued?

    Posted 11-18-2015 09:26 AM

    Hi Patricia:

     

    To me being 100% cataloged means having photos, measurements, condition reports-everything filled out in the database.  Everything new that comes in is at that point, but items that were accepted before computers are hit or miss.  By that standard, I'd say we're far from 100% fully cataloged, though almost the entire collection is at least registered in the database.  With a collection of 70,000 artifacts, it'd be difficult for the two of us on staff who are collections managers to actually get things to a point where it is 100% fully cataloged, especially because we have a collection that is over 100 years old.  As long as what you have is at least registered and has location information in your database, you're in a good place.  That's something you can (and should) build on.

     

    At my first job out of grad school, I worked on a collection inventory at a museum that was about to start a major renovation.  To finish that project, it took five full time catalogers about two years to get everything to 100% cataloged, and we were completely dedicated to just that project the whole time.  That's not realistic for many smaller museums.

     

    We do the best we can here.  If we're interacting with an artifact in any way (reorganizing a row in storage, pulling something for a visitor, etc) and it isn't properly cataloged, we take the time to deal with it before putting it back in storage. Just by doing that, I've cataloged about 2,000 artifacts myself over the last two years since I started here.

     

    Anyway, those are my thoughts. 

     

    Geoff Woodcox

    Assistant Curator of Collections

    State Historical Society of North Dakota

    612 E Boulevard Avenue

    Bismarck, ND 58505

    (701) 328-3608

     

     

     

     






  • 6.  RE: Is Your Museum Collection 100% Catalogued?

    Posted 11-18-2015 10:24 AM

    I also work for a small museum, and I've volunteered with small museums in the past. I agree with what others have said; 75% documentation in some form or another is pretty good for a small museum, even if much of it is bare bones.

    ------------------------------
    Hadley Sibon
    Curatorial Assistant
    Aurora Regional Fire Museum
    Aurora IL



  • 7.  RE: Is Your Museum Collection 100% Catalogued?

    Posted 11-19-2015 10:38 AM

    75 % cataloged sounds like a great foundation!  As colleagues have already stated, the degree to which an artifact is documented varies and colors what we might mean when we say an artifact is "fully cataloged". I would say that if the artifact has a record in the current data management system, is in the location noted, and is described well enough to be spotted in its storage location that it is "cataloged" to a very minimal standard.

    I suggest using that as your baseline and working out from there with sections of the collection in terms of photographs, scans, detailed descriptions and background information.  This is an ongoing process as research is continous on all areas of the collection.

    Speaking from my situation - I am one of two curatorial staff (myself and our Archivist) and daily make some sort of progress on "cataloging" the collection.  This could range from a simple correction to a description to a detailed description and photograph with a new chunk of knowledge about the artifact added to the paper and electronic records.

    Definitely consider using the help of volunteers or interns - but do be aware that they will need lots of supervision and their work checked for accuracy and consistency.  I figure that for every 3 hour time slot filled by an intern or volunteer helping me with collections work, I am spending an additional hour of my curatorial time making sure that all is up to par and done correctly.  That is just the nature of the work and I am happy to invest the training time to make sure all is smooth and consistent for record integrity.

    This foundation might be a great way to start asking for funding for collections care supplies, database software and support subscriptions and upgraded facilities.  Sounds like a great start!

    ------------------------------
    Sharon McCullar
    Registrar
    Lakeshore Museum Center
    Muskegon MI



  • 8.  RE: Is Your Museum Collection 100% Catalogued?

    Posted 11-18-2015 11:47 AM
    Edited by Claire Aldenhuysen 11-18-2015 11:47 AM

    Your board members sure do have a funny sense of humor. ;)

    I've spent the better part of the past year and a half cataloging specimens from my museum's enormous fossil collection -- to give you perspective, I recently finished cataloging two minor collections (each containing at least 1,000 micro-fossils) and my collections managers both applauded me and spent the rest of the day congratulating me! 

    I don't think of uncataloged objects as a bad thing... I call it job security. :)

    ------------------------------
    Claire Aldenhuysen
    Museology Graduate Program - University of Washington
    Seattle WA



  • 9.  RE: Is Your Museum Collection 100% Catalogued?

    Posted 11-18-2015 02:01 PM

    Greetings from Sitka, AK!  The Sitka History Museum is a small institution with a sizable collection.  The only other permanent employee besides myself is the Executive Director.  We have roughly over 8,000 artifacts, over 100,000 archives, and nearly 25,000 photos.  Only about 25% of our collections have a comprehensive digital catalog entry.  We have hard-copy accession files for many more, but with vastly varying degrees of information.  The museum closed in August for major renovations and we decided to use the opportunity to enhance our understanding of our collection.  We have brought on a collections management fellow for a defined term just to audit and digitally catalog the collection.  Our Board graciously dipped into our hard-earned savings to provide room and a stipend to the fellow and a grant helped us offset the cost of setting up a temporary collections lab, complete with a fresh stock of archival supplies.  I have no delusions that the collection will be 100% cataloged by the time we open our new facility in spring of 2017.  Based on our current pace, we would be lucky to make it to 50%.  But...we will be closer than we were on August 1st of this year.  75% would be a dream for us and something the Valdez Museum should be proud of.     

    ------------------------------
    Kristy Griffin
    Curator of Collections & Exhibits
    Sitka History Museum
    Sitka AK



  • 10.  RE: Is Your Museum Collection 100% Catalogued?

    Posted 11-19-2015 10:33 AM

    Hi Patricia,

    I agree with the other posters who recommend defining "fully catalogued". It may mean identifying mandatory fields that must be completed for any new acquisitions and identifying significant objects within the existing collection to which to apply this standard or it may mean completing all fields, but I think the bigger issue - and an opportunity for discussion with your board is the idea that once an object is catalogued, your job is complete. In reality, the catalogue for many objects is changing and evolving as new information about it is discovered, its status within the collection changes, etc.

    Metrics are wonderful tools, and certainly allow us to gauge how we manage and care for our collections; identifying how your organization quantifies those metrics ensures you can do that in a meaningful (and realistic!) way. But understanding the bigger picture of the fluidity of documentation is just as valuable - especially at the governance level.

    ------------------------------
    Cathy Ritchie
    Collections Management Advisor
    Government of Yukon, Museums Unit
    Whitehorse YT



  • 11.  RE: Is Your Museum Collection 100% Catalogued?

    Posted 11-19-2015 10:10 AM

    Hi Patricia,

    I'm glad to see you have received a lot of good input.  I'd like to add that this might be a perfect opportunity to talk to your board about developing a strategic plan. This can be an enlightening process for your board, and ultimately provide guidance on your priorities and allocation of resources. (It's also handy to be able to point back to this plan the next time a board member questions your priorities!)

    Good luck!

    Carmen

    ------------------------------
    Carmen Langel



  • 12.  RE: Is Your Museum Collection 100% Catalogued?

    Posted 11-19-2015 04:00 PM

    Dear Colleagues,

    Thank you so much for taking time to respond to my query.  Reading through the responses, I see two main points that are being made: 1) 75% is a fantastic foundation for a museum of our staff and collection size, and 2) it may be helpful when talking to board members or the public to define the different levels of cataloguing.

    For the Valdez Museum,bare bones cataloguing consists of the object name and, if we are lucky, a home location and complete cataloguing consists of photographing, measuring, and filling in as complete information as possible, such as donor information and provenance. Due to the state of our records management in previous years (especially before using a computer database) this is often a lengthy process of backtracking, going back to hard-copy donation records and accession books, online researching of similar items for data about form and function, and tracking down current information on the original donors. It’s the real detective work.

    Once again, thank you so much for your time and consideration.

    ------------------------------
    Patricia Relay
    Executive Director
    Valdez Museum & Historical Archive
    Valdez AK