I do not believe that volunteers should be required to be members in order to volunteer. Putting a financial barrier between your volunteer and their service is a great way to kill diversity and inclusion. Quick story: when I graduated, it was the height of the recession. I was unemployed, but highly skilled, and seeking to serve, be around other people, etc. So I volunteered at a number of organizations, happily, in a number of roles. Could I have afforded $50 for membership? Nope, because Sallie Mae has to get her due. Did I provide more than $50 service to my orgs? You bet I did.
Should service be excluded because someone is on a limited income? I feel that that's not going to grow the corps of volunteers (and possible future colleagues). I feel the same way about requiring staff to be members. Many are, and many do, on their own volition. I just don't think that your ability to financially contribute is an accurate measure of dedication to the organization or mission.
Own opinions, etc. etc.
------------------------------
Tracey Berg-Fulton
Collections Database Associate
Carnegie Museum of Art
Pittsburgh PA
Original Message:
Sent: 10-30-2015 09:17 AM
From: Geoffrey Woodcox
Subject: Museum Volunteer Dues and Membership Fees
Volunteers at our institution provide many valuable services that aren't feasible for us to have paying positions for, but are still necessary. We need people to give directions around the building. We need people who can work on behind the scenes projects. Some of our volunteers have been with us for longer than I've been alive!
I've got to be honest--if I were volunteering my time and providing a service for free and then someone started requiring me to pay just to volunteer, I might stop coming. Not everyone would feel that way, but I think there are at least some people out there who would. Requiring volunteers to pay says that their time and contributions aren't valuable enough on their own. I don't think that the people who support our organization should become revenue streams.
I think memberships should be gifted in return for people's time. You're getting a service that, if you were paying someone hourly, might cost you $5,-$10,000 per year. Yet you're getting it for free. Giving someone a $50-$100 membership free of charge is a very small asking price for many hours of that person's time.
------------------------------
Geoffrey Woodcox
Assistant Curator of Collections
State Historical Society of North Dakota
Bismarck ND
Original Message:
Sent: 10-23-2015 09:35 AM
From: Mark Osterman
Subject: Museum Volunteer Dues and Membership Fees
Dear Colleagues,
I am trying to gauge how many institutions require their volunteer guides to pay either dues or membership fees to be part of their program. If so, what is the rationale used to explain to volunteers why the fees are charged. I am also interested in hearing opinions from those who think such fees or memberships should be gifted as part of the program rather than paid for.
Thank you in advance for your responses.
Mark
------------------------------
Mark Osterman
Guiding Programs Manager
Vizcaya Museum and Gardens
Miami, FL 33141
------------------------------