I respectfully disagree, John. I think rather than limiting a museum, a good mission statement focuses our actions and provides a compass for what we collect. If a mission isn't allowing a museum to do what a community expects, it's time to revise the mission to adjust to the community's needs while maintaining professional standards and ethics. It shouldn't be set in stone and, in my opinion, should be re-examined regularly to ensure we're serving our communities and doing what we set out to do.
I think of a mission statement as a lens rather than as a set of blinders and I think it's an essential part of the picture.
------------------------------
Geoffrey Woodcox
Assistant Curator of Collections
State Historical Society of North Dakota
Bismarck ND
Original Message:
Sent: 03-14-2016 08:10 AM
From: John Jacobsen
Subject: Refining Mission Statement
I do not believe that "focused mission statements" serve today's community service museums that depend on multiple revenues and audiences who have multiple needs. Instead, a carefully prioritized list of intentional purposes, reigned in by the museum's guiding principles, is a more useful and meaningful planning and evaluation framework. Museums are more like the US Coast Guard that proudly claims multiple missions but unites all their operations under their value statement, Semper Paratus. Contrary to popular nineties business guru Jim Collins, museums should not try to be like a hedgehog and do just one thing well, we should embrace that today's museums must be more like the canny fox that is good at many things.
Additionally, focused missions often carry a covert agenda of trying to stop a museum from activities that some staff or leadership find distasteful but that the community values such as traveling exhibitions, function rentals, tourism and economic development, and helping businesses provide community services.
------------------------------
John Jacobsen
CEO
White Oak
Marblehead MA