It's been suggested to me by the director of our Foundation (we are an academic museum) that I try to recruit a PhD student as a member of our collections committee. On the one hand, I find the idea intriguing, especially since one reason we need to recruit is that our existing members are aging and either literally dying or very, very infirm. They have (and had) been the lions of curatorial and archives management in our region, but are having trouble keeping up with even our, very light (four regular agendae a year), requirements. We went with digital "meetings" long before the pandemic to ensure that our frail members could comfortably participate, but even that has become burdensome.
It is such a shame because collectively, they had such deep knowledge of local and regional history and what objects were where.
It would be fabulous to have the perspective a much younger eye and opinion, but I see the possible drawbacks including getting someone to be fully engaged for a short time, only to have them get swamped with dissertation requirements or taking a new post that precludes extra-curriculars. I am getting close to retirement myself and would like to find ways to engage the rising crop of museum pros and scholars. Those in my generation volunteered for all sorts of advisory and leadership roles and now we need to cultivate the next generation.
Does any of you see the pitfalls I am not? Had any of you tried this? What's been your experience? Thank you! Vivian
------------------------------
Vivian Zoë
Executive Director
Slater Memorial Museum
Norwich CT
------------------------------